(All pictures have been removed from the articles because they take up so much memory in each post. To see the pictures use the web address and visit the sites of the newspapers.)
http://www.therecord.com/news-story/5327831-students-heads-in-a-cloud-and-the-principal-loves-it/
Feb 06, 2015 |
Students’ heads in a cloud and the principal loves it
Waterloo Region Record
By Vik Kirsch
GUELPH – It'll soon be a praiseworthy compliment when Centennial Collegiate students are described as having their heads in the cloud.
On Monday through Wednesday in a pilot project, the public high school is outfitting its 300 Grade 9 students with basic Chromebook laptops designed for "cloud computing."
This will allow them to access online Google Chrome resources like word processing, graphing and presentation, work on projects together and store the results for easy access from virtually anywhere.
Teachers will be able to monitor and assess student progress remotely.
"It's about public education and universal access to technology," principal Scot Bishop said Friday, his voice reflecting his excitement at the school becoming a local leader.
Costs are modest and will be borne by the school and Upper Grand District School Board, which is embracing the potential of cloud computing, he noted.
The initiative also reflects a saving from a declining need for physical resources such as books because of the low cost of alternative cloud computing.
Bishop said embracing the technology dovetails perfectly with the school's drive to boost student learning and engagement.
While the stripped-down Chromebooks are essentially basic netbooks, Bishop said they're still powerful resources because cloud computing allows them to tap secure online programs and resources — so they essentially function like powerful, more sophisticated computers.
He saw the potential of the technology first-hand last year when a daughter attending John F. Ross Collegiate worked at a cottage on a school project together with two other girls, even though one was visiting Florida at the time.
A teacher at another location, in Guelph, provided advice and guidance to help move the project forward. "There's real-time interaction." And all they needed was literally at their fingertips.
Upper Grand supports cloud computing through a secure, controlled-access wireless initiative called Bring Your Own Device and digital resources worked into lesson plans.
It takes advantage of Google applications intended for the education setting.
"They've carved out a section of the cloud for us," Bishop said of his school board.
Examples of what students could work on? The principal cited research projects, book reviews and presentations.
"They're very rich resources."
Students will be assigned laptops they can take home for out-of-classroom learning and work at their leisure, as well as keeping them over the summer months to do more of the same.
Over the secure cloud, they'll be able to email each other, safe in the knowledge unauthorized individuals won't be able to breach that convenient and easy access, he added.
News services
http://toronto.ctvnews.ca/poor-air-quality-in-toronto-schools-could-impair-learning-environment-1.2219342
Poor air quality in Toronto schools could impair learning environment
Many Toronto classrooms have elevated carbon dioxide levels, according to Toronto District School Board documents obtained by CTV News.
Experts generally recommend avoiding indoor CO2 concentrations above 1000 parts per million, with one study even showing drops in certain cognitive abilities at that threshold.
But data shows that more than 40 per cent of schools tested in Toronto have registered above that ceiling within the past five years.
Reg Ayre, a manager at Toronto Public Health, said the ideal situation for a classroom would be at most between 800 and 1000 PPM. He said levels creeping up past that mark won’t cause any health problems, but that people often begin complaining about air quality in a room with that much CO2.
“You have to have very high levels of carbon dioxide to initiate some kind of change in the body,” Ayre said. “Carbon dioxide is really important, though, in monitoring the quality of the indoor air because it gives you a sense of the amount of fresh air that’s introduced into a classroom.”
Robert Whiting, a senior project manager with the Canadian Centre for Occupational Health and Safety, said while carbon dioxide on its own isn’t harmful, it often acts as an indicator for other, nastier pollutants in the air.
“Carbon dioxide never comes by itself,” Whiting said. “If you hit a value above 1000 (PPM), it means you really need to do something to ventilate the area better.”
The main cause of carbon dioxide build-up indoors is breathing – the molecule is emitted as a by-product of respiration, and when large groups spend time in close quarters, the air begins to fill with CO2.
Normal levels for fresh, outdoor air range between 300 to 400 PPM, and most organizations say about twice as much CO2 should be expected in indoor environments. Stale, stuffy air could be an indication of high levels of carbon dioxide and other molecules not found naturally in air, and should be tested for problems, Whiting said.
According to nearly 300 pages obtained through a freedom of information request, more than 100 of the TDSB’s 591 schools have had an air quality test at least once since 2010. Forty-six of those schools had at least one classroom measure above 1000 PPM, with several of the schools measuring upwards of 2000 PPM, and as high as 2650 PPM in one instance.
After being visited by a technician, about one quarter of these schools were repaired and retested, with most of the schools falling back to an acceptable level when looked at again.
Still, many schools eclipsed the 1000 PPM mark without any follow-up testing. And readings are only ever taken when official complaints are made to the school board, despite teachers’ federations privately hearing complaints for years.
“We hear regularly from teachers in the classroom and in schools that the air is bad, that it’s dirty, that it gives them headaches and makes them tired,” said Michael Platt, the executive officer of the Ontario Secondary School Teachers’ Federation. “It’s a chronic problem.”
Platt said he was “quite shocked” at how high some of the CO2 readings were in Toronto schools.
“It’s not acceptable for my members that work there,” he said. “And it’s certainly not acceptable for the students, the children that are growing and developing, to have to sit there for hours on hours every day.”
A problem for students in particular
On top of creating an uncomfortable atmosphere and acting as an indicator for other pollutants, carbon dioxide by itself might even affect students’ ability to learn.
Mark Mendell, a California-based researcher who has published several papers on indoor air quality and ventilation, said there’s a large body of evidence linking high CO2 levels to illness and absence, as well as reduced work performance.
He said parents should pay more attention to the way air quality might be affecting their children’s education.
“I think people should want their schools to be better ventilated because of the evidence that low ventilation rate is associated with adverse outcomes,” the former Berkeley Lab scientist said.
In one paper, Mendell’s team measured a significant drop in decision-making ability at 2500 PPM, with effects noticeable at as low as 1000 PPM.
Though Mendell said his study should be replicated before drawing any conclusions from it, he said his team was surprised to see carbon dioxide alone having a measurable effect on people’s performance.
“It would be shocking to think that levels of carbon dioxide that you would sometimes get in buildings would lead to such a decrement in abilities.”
Not a problem, TDSB says
The school board reiterated that none of the carbon dioxide levels were at all unsafe to breathe.
“To be clear, there is no school or site in the entire Toronto District School Board that has unhealthy or unsafe air,” Ryan Bird, a spokesperson for the board, said.
Bird said the CO2 readings were often indicative of a blocked vent or another minor problem with ventilation systems, which were easily fixed.
“We rely upon our staff and students to let us know if they have issues with stagnant air or something off in a classroom,” Bird said, noting that single measurements weren’t indicative of an ongoing problem.
“It doesn’t necessarily reflect constant levels, but one point in time when that was measured and used to correct the problem.”
Others, though, consider poor indoor ventilation to be an ongoing problem, especially inside aging school buildings.
Whiting said many older schools were built before current ventilation standards existed, and that some schools are shut down due to the restrictive costs of bringing the building up to code.
And Mendell, who measured constant readings in California schools in a separate study, said a lack of school funding and a push towards energy conservation is causing air quality in schools to trend downwards.
“It definitely does not get enough attention,” Mendell said. “And so this kind of issue often gets ignored completely because it’s not convenient to pay attention to it.”
With a report from CTV Toronto's Naomi Parness
Jesse Tahirali, CTVNews.ca Staff
Published Tuesday, February 3, 2015 6:14PM EST
Last Updated Tuesday, February 3, 2015 6:21PM EST
Published Tuesday, February 3, 2015 6:14PM EST
Last Updated Tuesday, February 3, 2015 6:21PM EST
Many Toronto classrooms have elevated carbon dioxide levels, according to Toronto District School Board documents obtained by CTV News.
Experts generally recommend avoiding indoor CO2 concentrations above 1000 parts per million, with one study even showing drops in certain cognitive abilities at that threshold.
But data shows that more than 40 per cent of schools tested in Toronto have registered above that ceiling within the past five years.
Reg Ayre, a manager at Toronto Public Health, said the ideal situation for a classroom would be at most between 800 and 1000 PPM. He said levels creeping up past that mark won’t cause any health problems, but that people often begin complaining about air quality in a room with that much CO2.
“You have to have very high levels of carbon dioxide to initiate some kind of change in the body,” Ayre said. “Carbon dioxide is really important, though, in monitoring the quality of the indoor air because it gives you a sense of the amount of fresh air that’s introduced into a classroom.”
Robert Whiting, a senior project manager with the Canadian Centre for Occupational Health and Safety, said while carbon dioxide on its own isn’t harmful, it often acts as an indicator for other, nastier pollutants in the air.
“Carbon dioxide never comes by itself,” Whiting said. “If you hit a value above 1000 (PPM), it means you really need to do something to ventilate the area better.”
The main cause of carbon dioxide build-up indoors is breathing – the molecule is emitted as a by-product of respiration, and when large groups spend time in close quarters, the air begins to fill with CO2.
Normal levels for fresh, outdoor air range between 300 to 400 PPM, and most organizations say about twice as much CO2 should be expected in indoor environments. Stale, stuffy air could be an indication of high levels of carbon dioxide and other molecules not found naturally in air, and should be tested for problems, Whiting said.
According to nearly 300 pages obtained through a freedom of information request, more than 100 of the TDSB’s 591 schools have had an air quality test at least once since 2010. Forty-six of those schools had at least one classroom measure above 1000 PPM, with several of the schools measuring upwards of 2000 PPM, and as high as 2650 PPM in one instance.
After being visited by a technician, about one quarter of these schools were repaired and retested, with most of the schools falling back to an acceptable level when looked at again.
Still, many schools eclipsed the 1000 PPM mark without any follow-up testing. And readings are only ever taken when official complaints are made to the school board, despite teachers’ federations privately hearing complaints for years.
“We hear regularly from teachers in the classroom and in schools that the air is bad, that it’s dirty, that it gives them headaches and makes them tired,” said Michael Platt, the executive officer of the Ontario Secondary School Teachers’ Federation. “It’s a chronic problem.”
Platt said he was “quite shocked” at how high some of the CO2 readings were in Toronto schools.
“It’s not acceptable for my members that work there,” he said. “And it’s certainly not acceptable for the students, the children that are growing and developing, to have to sit there for hours on hours every day.”
A problem for students in particular
On top of creating an uncomfortable atmosphere and acting as an indicator for other pollutants, carbon dioxide by itself might even affect students’ ability to learn.
Mark Mendell, a California-based researcher who has published several papers on indoor air quality and ventilation, said there’s a large body of evidence linking high CO2 levels to illness and absence, as well as reduced work performance.
He said parents should pay more attention to the way air quality might be affecting their children’s education.
“I think people should want their schools to be better ventilated because of the evidence that low ventilation rate is associated with adverse outcomes,” the former Berkeley Lab scientist said.
In one paper, Mendell’s team measured a significant drop in decision-making ability at 2500 PPM, with effects noticeable at as low as 1000 PPM.
Though Mendell said his study should be replicated before drawing any conclusions from it, he said his team was surprised to see carbon dioxide alone having a measurable effect on people’s performance.
“It would be shocking to think that levels of carbon dioxide that you would sometimes get in buildings would lead to such a decrement in abilities.”
Not a problem, TDSB says
The school board reiterated that none of the carbon dioxide levels were at all unsafe to breathe.
“To be clear, there is no school or site in the entire Toronto District School Board that has unhealthy or unsafe air,” Ryan Bird, a spokesperson for the board, said.
Bird said the CO2 readings were often indicative of a blocked vent or another minor problem with ventilation systems, which were easily fixed.
“We rely upon our staff and students to let us know if they have issues with stagnant air or something off in a classroom,” Bird said, noting that single measurements weren’t indicative of an ongoing problem.
“It doesn’t necessarily reflect constant levels, but one point in time when that was measured and used to correct the problem.”
Others, though, consider poor indoor ventilation to be an ongoing problem, especially inside aging school buildings.
Whiting said many older schools were built before current ventilation standards existed, and that some schools are shut down due to the restrictive costs of bringing the building up to code.
And Mendell, who measured constant readings in California schools in a separate study, said a lack of school funding and a push towards energy conservation is causing air quality in schools to trend downwards.
“It definitely does not get enough attention,” Mendell said. “And so this kind of issue often gets ignored completely because it’s not convenient to pay attention to it.”
With a report from CTV Toronto's Naomi Parness
You can not see the anti robot script or hear the numbers being read. May be why there are no comments being left. Should get your blog address into the GTA staffrooms.
ReplyDeleteIn my opinion Sachin Maharaj is going against OCT for writing negative comments about seniority and supply teachers and merit pay for those he deems inferior to himself. HE SEEMS TO BE A STOOLIE FOR THE TRUSTEES ASSOCIATIONS, HOWARD GOODMAN AND THE MINISTRY. He seems to be in a big conflict of interest. Why isnt Etfo and the ministry, where the toronto star says he is a curriculum advisor, not stopping his anti experienced supply teacher rants. Did I mention he became a member of OCT in 2007. He has taken an AQ in Law and now thinks he is an expert in education law. He is also supposed to be a teacher with the TDSB. He also is calling for principals to do all the hiring. Very hard to find a good principal. Most have been put in that position by friends and relatives. They then hire friends and relatives and the young and sexy. The other 4 fools can be found sitting in the school office waiting to be interviewed for a job that is already gone. Ever wonder why positions are being advertised that have a start date that has already begun. Now you know. The principals friend/relative/etc... is already in the position. The Ministry is not standing behind Reg 274 and the unions are not either. The union locals are looking out for the boards it seems. Maharaj seems to not have done much research as his ideas go against the current successful education systems.
Corruption is rampant in all school boards due to the lack of accountability. Privatize all schools thus forcing them to be accountable to students! That's what "putting students first" really means. Vote Libertarian.
ReplyDeleteI have contacted Peter Aguiar and John Brighton after spending much time on hold with the HELP desk about the Growing Success reporting system. The run around teachers get is off the charts. Witness the numerous e mails sent out recently dealing with report cards. I received a visit from a super apologizing for the challenges teachers face and reassuring me my concerns would be taken to the director. Is a CEO of a company not aware of the challenges faced by employees? Could I patronize parents the way teachers are by admin? If a system works why should a HELP desk be necessary. The reality is that the time and effort required to fulfill a job requirement takes its toll on the physical and mental well being of teachers. In order to save $$ the Growing Success reporting system in the TCDSB is being developed on the backs of teachers. And it is getting worse, not better. Principals can commiserate but in the end the reports must be done no matter how long it takes and what glitches are faced by an inadequate system, created by people who probably wrote their reports in longhand, and have an interest in technology and maybe computers part 1.
ReplyDeleteYou nailed it, there is no effective mechanism to be able to discuss issues beyond the staff level, we are our own worst enemies in that we "soldier on" and work issues out amongst ourselves. You also nailed it when you mentioned that jobs would be lost if something had to be outsourced. Look at the qualifications of those in positions of responsibility, Human Resources was headed by a high school Geography teacher, the Academic ICT coordinator was a History teacher who doesn't have Computers part 1. The Peter principle is so very evident in the TCDSB. I feel for supply teachers who are either not connected or do not hail for Maple/Woodbridge. Many are not even products of the old MSSB.
ReplyDelete